Dear Friends,

Illegal immigration isn’t just a problem for South Texas, Arizona, or California. It’s a national crisis—and Idaho is feeling the impact. Trafficking routes stretch from both the southern and northern borders into every region of the country, and our communities are not immune.

Here in Idaho, we’ve seen the consequences of the last four years: cartel-linked drug operations, the exploitation of minors through human trafficking, and illegal labor that drives down wages and strains schools, hospitals, and law enforcement. These aren’t distant policy debates—they are real threats to the safety of Idaho families, the economy, and our state sovereignty.

As your Attorney General, I want to speak plainly about what my office is doing, what state law gives us the authority to do, and why understanding those boundaries is essential to having a serious conversation about public safety and immigration enforcement.

Under current Idaho law, the Attorney General does not have general authority to investigate or prosecute immigration-related crimes. Unlike local prosecutors and sheriffs, whose jurisdiction is county-based, my office may only act where specific authority has been granted by state law.

For example, the Legislature has authorized my office to investigate internet crimes against children statewide under Idaho Code section 67-1410. But state law does not currently authorize my office to investigate or prosecute most crimes like human trafficking or crimes included in the Idaho ICE Act. This isn’t a matter of discretion—it’s the legal framework we’re required to follow.

That distinction matters. While we partner closely with local and federal law enforcement whenever possible, our jurisdiction is defined by the authority granted to us in state law. Until that law changes, we will continue to use every legal tool available and authorized to protect Idahoans.

And that’s exactly what we’re doing.

Over the past two years, my office has joined multiple lawsuits to stop the Biden Administration’s unlawful immigration policies. We partnered with Texas in defending its sovereign right to secure its own border. And just this week, I joined a coalition of states in an amicus brief defending the Trump Administration’s authority to enforce federal immigration law and block sanctuary policies in states like Illinois.

At the same time, we’re actively defending Idaho’s legislative efforts to safeguard public safety. That includes House Bill 83, recently enacted to strengthen our state’s ability to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. Predictably, the ACLU filed suit almost immediately after the bill was signed into law. This week, my office appeared in federal court to defend the law and Idaho’s authority to play a meaningful role in enforcing immigration policy. While the court issued a narrow temporary restraining order blocking two provisions—those that would create state-level offenses for unlawful entry or re-entry into the U.S. when tied to a separate criminal investigation or detention—it allowed the rest of the law to temporarily take effect immediately while we await the judge’s full decision. That’s a significant step forward in Idaho’s ongoing effort to work alongside federal partners to protect our state.

With a new administration in Washington ready to restore the rule of law and national security, Idaho has a partner in the federal government willing to enforce immigration policy instead of undermining it. My office is engaged, coordinated, and committed to using every authority granted to us under Idaho law to defend our state’s sovereignty and protect our communities.

Best regards,